There are two types of digital transformation. There’s the kind that streamlines a business into a powerhouse, and there’s the kind that turns into a ghost ship; perfectly automated, technically efficient, and completely devoid of life. Right now, we are witnessing a massive shift in the way people do things. While your competitors are busy bragging about replacing their support staff with agentic AI, what they are often doing is building a wall between themselves and their customers.
With AI now being used by adversaries to reverse-engineer patches and generate exploits in hours rather than weeks, our old Patch Tuesday rhythm is essentially an open invitation to hackers. The truth is, the patching gap is a competitive weakness.
If we want to protect our organizations without drowning our teams in manual toil, we have to stop treating patching as a checklist and start treating it as a dynamic, intelligent discipline. Here is how we’re rethinking the vulnerability situation.
Today, every business is a technology business. Whether you run a boutique creative agency, a high-volume law firm, or a modern retail shop, your ability to operate depends entirely on your hardware, software, and connectivity.
When the Blue Screen of Death appears or your server decides to take an unscheduled nap, the clock starts ticking; and it’s ticking directly against your bottom line. This is where remote support shifts from being a nice-to-have to a mission-critical asset.
Working in IT, our job is to worry so you don’t have to. The things keeping us up at night in 2026 are vastly different from the headaches of five or ten years ago. Thanks to the invisible power of AI-driven automation and mature cloud ecosystems, many of the manual, soul-crushing tasks that used to define IT support have essentially vanished.
Take a quick walk through your business. When you look at the screens on the walls, what’s actually on them? If it’s a generic weather widget, a “Happy Monday!” slide that’s been up for three weeks, or a “No Signal” box, you aren’t looking at a technology investment.
You’re looking at a $10,000 screensaver.
| No events |
